Consolidation
Scaling out infrastructure is only one side of the equation for operating compute infrastructure in a cost-effective manner. We also need to be able to optimize on an on-going basis such that, for example, workloads running on under-utilized compute instances are compacted to fewer instances. This improves the overall efficiency of how we run workloads on the compute, resulting in less overhead and lower costs.
Karpenter offers two main ways this can be accomplished:
- Leverage the
ttlSecondsUntilExpired
property of Provisioners so that instances are regularly recycled, which will result in compaction of workloads indirectly - Since v0.15 its possible to use the Consolidation feature, which will actively attempt to compact under-utilized workloads
We'll be focusing on option 2 in this lab, and to demonstrate we'll be performing these steps:
- Adjust the Provisioner created in the previous section to enable consolidation
- Scale the
inflate
workload from 5 to 12 replicas, triggering Karpenter to provision additional capacity - Scale down the workload back down to 5 replicas
- Observe Karpenter consolidating the compute
Now, let's update the Provisioner to enable consolidation:
- Kustomize Patch
- Provisioner/default
- Diff
apiVersion: karpenter.sh/v1alpha5
kind: Provisioner
metadata:
name: default
spec:
consolidation:
enabled: true
apiVersion: karpenter.sh/v1alpha5
kind: Provisioner
metadata:
name: default
spec:
consolidation:
enabled: true
labels:
type: karpenter
limits:
resources:
cpu: 1000
memory: 1000Gi
providerRef:
name: default
requirements:
- key: karpenter.sh/capacity-type
operator: In
values:
- on-demand
- key: node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
operator: In
values:
- c5.large
- m5.large
- m5.xlarge
kind: Provisioner
metadata:
name: default
spec:
+ consolidation:
+ enabled: true
labels:
type: karpenter
limits:
resources:
Let's apply this update:
Now, let's scale our inflate
workload again to consume more resources:
This changes the total memory request for this deployment to around 12Gi, which when adjusted to account for the roughly 600Mi reserved for the kubelet on each node means that this will fit on 2 instances of type m5.large
:
Next, scale the number of replicas back down to 5:
We can check the Karpenter logs to get an idea of what actions it took in response to our scaling in the deployment:
The output will show Karpenter identifying specific nodes to cordon, drain and then terminate:
2022-09-06T19:30:06.285Z INFO controller.consolidation Consolidating via Delete, terminating 1 nodes ip-192-168-159-233.us-west-2.compute.internal/m5.large {"commit": "b157d45"}
2022-09-06T19:30:06.341Z INFO controller.termination Cordoned node {"commit": "b157d45", "node": "ip-192-168-159-233.us-west-2.compute.internal"}
2022-09-06T19:30:07.441Z INFO controller.termination Deleted node {"commit": "b157d45", "node": "ip-192-168-159-233.us-west-2.compute.internal"}
This will result in the Kubernetes scheduler placing any Pods on those nodes on the remaining capacity, and now we can see that Karpenter is managing a total of 1 node: